<Back
Next>

Results and dicussion (continued)


The values of the fluorescence lifetimes are quite large and almost constant (42.0-43.4 ns) over the vibrational progressions examined. Based on arguments used for anthracene derivatives, which have a 14π-electron-system as DPBBTD does, the nonradiative relaxations from the S1 state of DPBBTD are supposed to be unavailable as for 9,10-dichloroanthracene (DCA) or 9,10-dicyanoanthracene (DCNA). That is, the fluorescence quantum yield of jet-cooled DPBBTD is expected to be unity. This prediction can be verified by a check as to whether there is a heavy-atom effect on the fluorescence lifetime, i.e., shortening in the fluorescence lifetime due to the acceleration of the intersystem crossing (ISC) rate, for the DPBBTD-Xe vdW complexes.

Fluorescence lifetimes vs excitation energies of the vibronic bands.
fluorescence lifetimes

The fluorescence decay curve measured for the vdW complexes is single-exponential and its decay rate is definitely slower than the fluorescence decay rate of the bare molecule. The decay curve for the vdW complexes does not have a significant component of the fluorescence decay indicating the lifetime of 42.0-43.4 ns. Moreover, there is no component of the decay curve indicating the heavy-atom effect, which is the acceleration of the fluorescence decay due to ISC, at all. It seems that ISC does not occur, even if the spin-orbit coupling is enhanced by the heavy-atom effect. Therefore the fluorescence quantum yields should be unity.

Fluorescence decay curves of DPBBTD and DPBBTD-Xen. (a) Fluorescence decay of bare DPBBTD observed in the 584.98 nm photoexcitation. (b) Fluorescence decay of the vdW complexes of DPBBTD with Xe observed in the 553 nm photoexcitation.
fluorescence decay curves

<Top
Next>